The conclusion that can be made about James Chalmers option of Thomas Paine’s argument is that: "he believes that Pains' argument is relly based on the idea that Pain himself wants to rule the colonies." (Option C)
What is the explanation for the above?
Paine's arguments, according to Chalmers, are a fiction that would be destructive to the colonies, as independence is a ludicrous notion.
It would expose them to the French and Spaniards while costing them their most valued commercial partner at the moment, England. Hence, the idea was unacceptable.
Who is James Chalmer?
James Chalmers (August 4, 1841 in Ardrishaig, Argyll, Scotland—April 9, 1901 in Dopima, Goaribari Island) was a Scottish Congregationalist missionary who toured the southwest Pacific and became known as "the Livingstone of New Guinea."
Learn more about James Chalmer:
https://brainly.com/question/7828922
#SPJ1
