Wachbroit respond to Murray's claim that we are not biologically determined is that cloning can be good tool for medical issues such as bone transplant and it is a term to use so that it can make people feel better about it.
In the case above, I believe that Wachbroit made a better argument.
The case above is in regards to human cloning. Murray is known to have stated that humans are not able to escape grief and a person will not be able to replace other people.
He stated that these clones are not biologically determined and as such one need to nature and also nurture them. Wachbroit is one that holds the view that there is no unique harm been done and human cloning should not be ban but they can be regulated.
He stated that cloning can be good tool for medical reasons such as bone transplant and one should not make a big deal out of it.
Therefore, Wachbroit respond to Murray's claim that we are not biologically determined is that cloning can be good tool for medical issues such as bone transplant and it is a term to use so that it can make people feel better about it.
Learn more about human cloning from
https://brainly.com/question/23150109
#SPJ1
