The court's CONCLUSION in terms of decision and holding was:
Duress is an act of coercion through the use of unlawful threats that destroys the victims free will.
Duress does not invalidate a contract that has been entered into with total view or knowledge of all the facts, and with good amount of time and opportunity that could have been used for investigation.
Note that in the Olmstead v. Saint Paul Public Schools Case the court said that there was a" total knowledge of fact, there was also reasonable time, there was an attorney" and as such, there was no scenario of duress.
Learn more about court from
https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ12
