emowolf101
contestada

In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that statements about public figures are examples of libel only when they are made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth.
In which of the following ways does this ruling support a healthy democracy?
A. It promotes competition among a variety of media sources.
B. It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials.
C. If fosters cooperation between the media and the government.
D. It requires absolute certainty of all published information.

Respuesta :

MissPhiladelphia
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The ruling said in the statement above supports a healthy democracy would be that it allows people the freedom to criticize public officials. Hope this answers the questions. Have a nice day.
holesstanham

Answer: B. It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials.

This ruling highlights one of the most important characteristics of a well-functioning democracy. In a democracy, free speech is extremely valuable as it allows people to exchange ideas. Moreover, representatives need to be accountable to their constituents who elect them. In order for this accountability to take place, citizens should be able to criticize public officials when they commit wrong acts or break their promises.

Otras preguntas