Respuesta :
Answer:
Provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional.
Online content-based restrictions violate the guarantee of freedom of speech.
Explanation:
got it right
The two statements that describe the Supreme Court's ruling in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union is that the provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional, and Online content-based restrictions violate the guarantee of freedom of speech.
What is Civil Liberties?
Civil liberties are rights and freedoms that governments promise not to limit without due process, whether through the constitution, legislation, or judicial interpretation.
The Supreme Court's decision in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union can be summarized as, In the 1996 Communications Decency Act (CDA) was unconstitutional, and online content-based limitations infringe the right to free speech.
Therefore, option B and D are correct.
Learn more about the Civil Liberties, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/5992809
#SPJ2