Both bacteria and amoeba are unicellular organisms. Bacteria are considered to be prokaryotes, whereas amoebas are considered to be eukaryotes. How will you justify this reasoning?

Though both are unicellular, bacteria possess a well-defined nucleus without a nucleolus. Amoebas possesses a nucleus with a nucleolus, but no nuclear membrane.

Though both are unicellular, bacteria possess a well-defined nucleus and all essential cell organelles, whereas amoebas do not possess a nucleus or cell organelles, except ribosomes.

Though both are unicellular, bacteria doesn’t possess a nucleus

"Though both are unicellular, bacteria doesn’t possess a nucleus" is the one among the following choices given in the question that justify this reasoning. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or the last option. I hope the answer has come to your help.

Answer Link

N8tcrawler N8tcrawler · Answer 2 · 2018-09-27T22:22:48+02:00

The correct answer is Though both are unicellular, bacteria doesn’t possess a nucleus.

The basic difference between amoeba and bacteria is that Amoeba is a protozoan and is eukaryotic organism while bacteria is a prokaryotic organism. The archaea and bacteria are prokaryotes while the other living organisms are eukaryotes. Amoeba like other eukaryotes contains cytoplasm and other cell contents inside the cell membrane and the DNA is packed inside the nucleus. The bacterial cell is also enclosed by a cell membrane and the cellular contents are present in the cytoplasm. The bacteria lack the membrane bound structures as opposed by the eukaryotes. nucleus, mitochondria and chloroplast are some of the organelles lacking in the prokaryotic bacteria.