Please respond with your thoughts.

If the big bang is considered a point of infinite mass and density wouldn't that make it like a black hole. Or as I am proposing a white hole. And if that were true couldn't the observable universe be all the matter that was expelled from the opposite side or white hole if you will. Furthermore it would explain why the observable galaxies are distributed in such a homogeneous and isotropic manner. Also this may be the reason for the environment of such high energy and low entropy in the early stages of the universe. However due to the time dilation of gravity involved when dealing with black holes the possibly ongoing emissions from the white hole would go unseen by onlookers due to the loss of energy before the light waves ever reached us. Vis a vi we can only see the matter whose reflectivity or luminescence allows us to and or is moving in conjunction with us now or was matter also expelled in the same visible timeframe from the origin point of the "big bang". However, at our current point in space we can no longer perceive the point at which the matter was or still is being expelled. Would love to get a scientific opinion, as I didn't even finish high school.

Thanks in advance
Richard

Respuesta :

Explanation:

well... you saying that the big bang is a white hole is wrong because in that case the universe would not exist as white holes throw out

a more realistic theory matter and antimatter collided and "entropy" caused more matter being present than antimatter so we have a universe to live in it was a lovely question but you forgot a common theory which I partially stated however do not take my theory as it is it may be wrong about some of the white hole part