Kim and Kanye were married and owned a vacation home called God's land as tenants by the entirety. One night,
Kim had too much to drink and got into an accident. She hit a car driven by Tupac, injuring him badly. Tupac sued and obtained a $2,000,000 judgment against Kim. Because Kim had insufficient insurance to pay this amount, Tupac wants to satisfy the judgment against God's Land. Which of the following is true in most American jurisdictions that allow tenancy by the entirety? Hint: Sawada v. Endo applies that view.
A: Tupac should be able to reach Kim's half-interest in God's Land, because tort judgments are generally an exception to the rule against unilateral severance.
B: Tupac will not be able to attach God's Plan at all, because property held in tenancy by the entirety is not subject to debts of one spouse only.
C: Tupac will not be able to reach God's Land now but can create a lien on the property, which she can enforce upon sale of the property.
D: Talia should be able to reach the entirety of Greenacre, because Kim was entitled to possession of the whole.